![]() It’s an open question whether Bluesky will soar or remain a pie in the sky. Bluesky did not respond to a request for comment. “Imagine you want your timeline to only be posts from your mutuals, or only posts that have cat photos, or only posts related to sports - you can simply pick your feed of choice from an open marketplace,” CEO Jay Graber wrote in a recent blog post. Bluesky also has “custom feeds,” which let users pick the algorithm that controls what they see. Other social platforms like TikTok, Facebook, Instagram or Twitter use secretive algorithms to show you what you’re more likely to be interested in. The app launched with a chronological feed, meaning you see posts in the order they are posted in. That is, giving users a choice in what they see. “Once you open it up and allow different forms of content moderation to dominate, it’s going to be a very different platform,” Messing said.īluesky’s approach to content moderation is similar to its approach to algorithms to decide what users see. Fewer than 100,000 people are on it right now. There is no way to send direct messages, for instance, and there is no verification system.įor now, Bluesky is like the back room at a house party where the cool kids and misfits found refuge from the increasingly rowdy rager out front - at least until it, too, is enveloped by chaos. While it looks and feels similar to Twitter, Bluesky lacks many of the features Twitter has built out over the years. While it seems unlikely that Bluesky could replace Twitter as a global information conduit any time soon, it is more intuitive and easy to use than 7-year-old Mastodon, which not long ago was touted as a possible Twitter replacement but which many find befuddlingly complicated and lacking in important features. And so it’s very, very difficult to to migrate to a different social media platform once you have thousands of followers on Twitter,” said Messing, who also worked on data science at Facebook and the Pew Research Center. “We are all active on Twitter because we are all active on Twitter. Just ask Mastodon, Truth Social or any other alternative network that’s sprung up more recently. And getting people, especially people who aren’t teenagers, to move to a new social network, is quite a challenge. It is in the people - the network of people who use and contribute to a platform. But as everyone - including Musk, who paid $44 billon for Twitter - knows, a social network’s value is not simply in the technology behind it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |